Peter Mponda Vs. Malawi Revenue Authority

dc.contributor.authorA.C. Chipeta,
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-29T08:27:22Z
dc.date.issued2005-08-12
dc.description.abstractThe court's ruling dismissed the plaintiff's application for a mandatory injunction to restrain the defendant, Malawi Revenue Authority, from detaining and seizing his vehicle, citing the legal authority of the defendant to pursue duty underpayment concerns directly from the current holder of the vehicle. The court emphasized that the Customs and Excise Act, particularly after amendments in Act No. 11 of 2003, permits the Revenue Authority to take action against entities possessing imported goods, regardless of ownership details. Consequently, the court found that the defendant's legal duties could not be restrained by an injunction, and thus, the application was dismissed with costs.
dc.identifier.citationHigh Court of Malawi, 'Peter Mponda v Malawi Revenue Authority', Civil Cause No 1931 of 2005, Justice A.C. Chipeta, 12 August 2005.
dc.identifier.otherCivil Cause No 1931 of 2005
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.rat.gov.mw/handle/123456789/89
dc.language.isoother
dc.publisherHigh Court of Malawi, Principal Registry.
dc.subjectSeizure of Vehicle
dc.subjectCustoms and Excise Law
dc.subjectInjunction and Interim Orders
dc.subjectLegal Duty of Revenue Authority
dc.subjectOwnership and Property Rights
dc.titlePeter Mponda Vs. Malawi Revenue Authority
dc.typeOther

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Peter Mponda Vs. Malawi Revenue Authority; Civil Cause No. 1931 of 2005_ocred.pdf
Size:
2.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections